1.Did the military and police operation codenamed Storm, apart from reintegrating the Krajina territory into the Republic of Croatia’s borders, had a goal to permanently remove the Serb population from those areas of Croatia?

The video is a part of the interactive narrative “Storm in The Hague” which covers five key points of contention between the Prosecution and the Defense at the trial of Croatian generals Gotovina, Čermak, and Markač. The Trial Chamber and the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), relying on the same facts and the same law, reached diametrically opposed conclusions.

Storm in The Hague is available at: http://oluja.sensecentar.org/

2.Did the shelling of Knin, Obrovac, Benkovac, and Gračac on 4 and 5 August 1995 target only military facilities and enemy firing positions, or did it target inhabited areas in order to cause panic among the people to make them flee?

The video is a part of the interactive narrative “Storm in The Hague” which covers five key points of contention between the Prosecution and the Defense at the trial of Croatian generals Gotovina, Čermak, and Markač. The Trial Chamber and the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), relying on the same facts and the same law, reached diametrically opposed conclusions.

Storm in The Hague is available at: http://oluja.sensecentar.org/

3.Were the murders of hundreds of Krajina’s civilians during and after Operation Storm perpetrated by civilians wearing military and police uniforms and motivated by financial gain and revenge or were they committed by Croatian soldiers and police officers as part of a campaign of widespread and systematic attacks on civilians?

The video is a part of the interactive narrative “Storm in The Hague” which covers five key points of contention between the Prosecution and the Defense at the trial of Croatian generals Gotovina, Čermak, and Markač. The Trial Chamber and the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), relying on the same facts and the same law, reached diametrically opposed conclusions.

Storm in The Hague is available at: http://oluja.sensecentar.org/

4.Neither the Prosecution nor the Defense contested that in the aftermath of the operation a wave of destruction, looting, and burning of Serb property swept the Krajina. Everything else remained controversial: the scale of the destruction; the motive behind it; the status of the perpetrators and the attitude of the Croatian civilian and military institutions towards the incidents.

5.Did the Croatian government in the aftermath of the operation prevent the return of the Serb refugees by passing administrative and bureaucratic measures or it was not obliged to allow the return of those Serbs who left Croatia voluntarily to join its enemies in Serbia?

The video is a part of the interactive narrative “Storm in The Hague” which covers five key points of contention between the Prosecution and the Defense at the trial of Croatian generals Gotovina, Čermak, and Markač. The Trial Chamber and the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), relying on the same facts and the same law, reached diametrically opposed conclusions.

Storm in The Hague is available at: http://oluja.sensecentar.org/